Case study · Food & Drink
Pub wisdom says pork scratchings make beer taste better. Mr Porky asked us to prove it during the World Cup, snacking’s biggest moment. Research, a real-life taste test and a food and beer scientist did exactly that. The story earned 202 pieces of coverage, 15 on broadcast, and 562 brand mentions.
- 562 brand mentions
- 202 pieces of coverage
- 15 broadcast pieces
- 45M combined media reach

- Client Mr Porky
- Sector Snacks
- Services Research, consumer PR, broadcast
- When During the World Cup
- Audience Beer drinkers and football fans
- Channels National and regional media, radio
What did Mr Porky need?
Mr Porky wanted to build awareness and get people talking during the World Cup, the peak moment for snacking.
- Business objective: grow awareness and sales during the World Cup.
- Communication objective: turn a piece of pub wisdom into a national talking point during the tournament.
What was the insight?
Everyone has heard that scratchings make beer taste better. Nobody had proved it. A claim everyone half-believes is a story when you test it.
The idea was prove the pub wisdom.
What did we do?
- National research. We found 76% of the nation think pork scratchings make beer taste better.
- A real-life taste test. We put the claim to the test with drinkers.
- A scientist. A food and beer scientist explained why it works.
- A radio day. We landed 14 radio interviews in one day.
What did it achieve?
Results by stage of the AMEC evaluation framework, with the source for each figure.
| Stage | Measure | Result | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outputs | Pieces of media coverage | 202 | Prohibition coverage log |
| Outputs | Broadcast pieces | 15 | Prohibition coverage log |
| Outputs | Combined media reach | 45M | Prohibition coverage log |
| Out-takes | Brand mentions | 562 | Prohibition coverage analysis |
| Out-takes | Campaign KPIs | All beaten | Prohibition campaign reporting |
What did Mr Porky get from it?
A national conversation about scratchings during the biggest snacking moment of the year, with the brand named 562 times.
What did we learn?
- Test what people already believe. A familiar claim made an easy headline.
- Add a scientist. Expert backing turned a fun idea into news.
- What we would do differently. agree retail sales tracking for the tournament period, so we can show the effect on volume.

